Bill Charging HIV/AIDS Patients with Rape if they Don’t Disclose Held

Legislation that criminalizes sexual situations involving HIV/AIDS sufferers who knowingly engage in sex without informing the other person was held Wednesday by the House Judiciary Committee.

HB 369 – Sexual Offenses and Statutory Nonconsent Amendments, sponsored by Representative Justin Fawson (Republican – North Ogden), amends statutory nonconsent to sexual activity to include sexual contact in situations where a person who is knowingly infected with HIV or AIDS and engages in sexual activity with a person who is unaware of their illness.

Will Carlson, representing the Statewide Association of Prosecutors, agrees with the legislation’s intent – however, he feels that it goes too far. “We join with the representative in searching out ways to prevent its spread. We appreciate the idea that the best and healthiest form of intimacy is a fully-informed intimacy,” said Carlson. “But with first-degree felonies, which is the heaviest hammer the criminal justice system can offer, this does not do what the sponsor is trying to do. This does not say if you have a crime and the offender is HIV-positive then that crime is enhanced. This says if you are HIV-positive and you are intimate, this is a crime unless you’ve disclosed your status.”

Troy Williams, executive director of Equality Utah, called the bill “a punitive approach” that further stigmatizes those who suffer from HIV or AIDS and could actually result in a reduction in HIV testing. “Like all people, we want to see a reduction in HIV infections. We want HIV-positive members of the LGBTQ community to be tested, know their status, and to not feel stigma in disclosing their status with intimate partners,” said Williams. “This proposed legislation could actually have the opposite effect. By increasing HIV-related stigma and potential criminal consequences for knowing and sharing one’s HIV-positive status, this bill could actually discourage HIV testing and disclosure. There’s no evidence that laws targeting people living with HIV for criminal penalties actually reduce the number of new cases of HIV or improve public health in any way.”

Like the others who testified, Ron Gordon, executive director of the Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice, also feels that HB 369 simply goes too far. “The question of whether that should have any kind of enhancement might be one proper for discussion, but this bill goes much further than that and takes conduct that right now would not be criminal at all and would make that a first-degree felony rape,” said Gordon. “That’s the concern that my commission has, is that it goes from being lawful under current law to first-degree felony rape. That’s a very big jump in our criminal code.”

Representative Karianne Lisonbee (Republican – Clearfield) believes the legislation is fine the way it is. “I really don’t see the problem with this bill. I think informed consent means informed consent. Whether the disease is transmitted or not, the person should inform, the person should disclose. If they don’t, it should be a crime because they are potentially infecting another person with a deadly disease. I don’t have a problem with this language.”

Representative Brian Greene (Republican – Pleasant Grove) agrees that something needs to be done but questioned going as far as labeling it as rape. “The question has been raised, shouldn’t this be criminal? Shouldn’t having sexual relations with somebody, an infected person having those relations with somebody else and not disclosing that be criminal? I think we all agree that it ought to be, but the question is should it be rape?” said Greene.

Greene also believes the statute itself needs fixing. “This is a problematic statute. It’s a poorly drafted statute, and we continue to come back to it and try to add new elements rather than fixing the statute,” said Greene. “I think [HB 369] just perpetuates the problems.” In 2015, Greene came under fire when he questioned whether engaging in sex with an unconscious person is rape in every instance while discussing legislation in the same section of code. Greene later apologized for his remarks.

Representative Brian King (Democrat – Salt Lake City) moved to hold the bill, a motion which unanimously passed. Fawson told committee members he would work on the bill and bring it back in a couple of days.

2 comments for “Bill Charging HIV/AIDS Patients with Rape if they Don’t Disclose Held

  1. February 24, 2017 at 11:34 am

    Or we could just allow those that choose to have sex with another person, to use their own personal responsibility and not put blame on the positive individual. These laws make HIV prevention much harder and no, everyone doesn’t agree that this law is even needed.

  2. Connie Shearer
    February 28, 2017 at 12:52 am

    My question, as a 21-year survivor of HIV who acquired HIV from my husband who did not disclose when I was only 21 years of age. Knowing that I still never blamed him for not disclosing because I accepted responsibility for the fact I didn’t ask for an HIV test before sex and that was in 1996, so my question is, how do you know who disclosed and who did not disclose their HIV status BEFORE sex? I found that over 21 years the majority of men I had sex with did not want to admit later they willingly chose to have sex with an HIV-Positive person because it was embarrassing to them.

    Next, for the cases, in which you can prove intent to infect, my next question is, when does personal responsibility come into play? Why are grown adults not being forced to get a simple FREE STD test before choosing to have sex with another human they just met? When are YOU the lawmakers going to use common sense instead of things like religion and or emotions as a basis for laws and rules?

    As an HIV-Positive woman who has been lied on, I demand justice! I demand common sense laws! I demand you start putting the blame where the blame belongs, on the individual who chose to have sex without an STD test!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *