OpEd – The Dangers of Junk-Polling: Libertas Institute’s Phony LGBT Poll

Guest OpEd:

Eric Ethington
Eric Ethington

“Should it be illegal for the government to fine you or put you in jail just because you fire an employee who doesn’t fit in with your other employees or who will likely need a lot of time off in the future?”

I’d be willing to bet if you polled the right group of people in Utah, you could easily get 8 out of 10 to agree with that question. But what if we wrote the same question another way?

“Should it be legal for employers to fire people of color for not being white, or women because they might get pregnant?”

Phrased that way, the same 8 out of 10 Utahns would probably saying ‘No way!’

Two polls, same question, different phrasing, opposite outcomes. That’s the danger of junk-polls, that feature questions written in just the right way so as to illicit a predetermined answer and desired outcome.

I saw a great example of a junk-poll earlier this week, when the Libertas Institute (one of two Utah affiliates of Heritage Foundation’s State Policy Network), and their president Connor Boyack, released a “poll” showing roughly 8 out of 10 Utahns saying “no way” to a non-discrimination law—a law being proposed in the Utah Legislature which would make it illegal to fire someone or evict them from their home just because they happen to be gay or transgender.

Like many, I found Boyack’s results shocking, considering multiple other polls have all shown consistent results of Utahns being vastly in favor of such laws (despite the Utah Legislature’s stubborn opposition to passing them). A poll commissioned by Equality Utah (conducted by professional polling firm Dan Jones & Associates) found 73 percent of Utahns in favor of a non-discrimination law. A poll conducted by the Human Rights Campaign found 77 percent in favor. And yet another poll by the Salt Lake Tribune showed 67 percent in favor.

How could three polls show identical results of an overwhelming majority in favor of a non-discrimination law, while Libertas Institute’s poll shows the exact opposite?

Well, the three polls showing massive support all asked roughly the same question: Should it be illegal for employers to fire someone just because they’re gay or transgender?

The poll question from Libertas Institute asked whether respondents supported fines or jail time for employers who choose not to associate with people they disagree with.

As BYU polling expert Quin Monson said in his article shredding Libertas’ poll, “The questions are unbalanced and inaccurate.. The methodology isn’t methodologically sound. .. The survey also also has some serious ethical and legal problems.

Boyack’s questions are pre-designed to fit the outcome he was hoping for, and used deceptive tactics like adding in the threat of jail time for violators—the proposed law in no way proposes jail time—and heavily weighting the sample with older age brackets. We also have no idea who was actually polled or their geographic location. Were they all from Provo?

There’s also the obvious question of bias. The Heritage Foundation’s State Policy Network (which includes both Libertas Institute and Sutherland Institute) has a set policy of opposing non-discrimination laws. Trusting Libertas Institute on non-discrimination laws is akin to trusting John Swallow’s opinion on ethical behavior.

True, Equality Utah has an obvious bias of hoping Utahns will favor of non-discrimination laws. But Equality Utah’s poll was conducted by an independent and reputable polling firm—the results of which were duplicated by the Salt Lake Tribune, again using a professional polling firm.

But let’s boil this all down to brass tacks. Allowing discrimination against hard working Utahns just because of their sexual orientation or gender identity is simply evil. Tens of thousands of LGBT people live in Utah, and half have experienced discrimination. The status of your employment and housing should be about your ability to do your job and pay your rent, nothing more.

Eric Ethington is the former Editor-in-Chief of Utah Political Capitol. He now lives in Boston and works for a social justice think tank. He blogs at NuanceStillMatters.com

Guest Op-Eds do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UPC. Want to submit your own? Click Here. We accept submissions from all Utah residents, regardless of political affiliation.

4 Replies to “OpEd – The Dangers of Junk-Polling: Libertas Institute’s Phony LGBT Poll

  1. People do not want to be forced to transgress their beliefs even though they must leave the sanctuary of the church and exist in the world. Where is the need to rob the most basic rights of association and conscience, forbid people from the public market by ordinance unless they submit to participation in repellent behaviour, and clear the way for lawsuits to obliterate remaining dissent? Let people do business, and let them succeed or fail on their merits. Let others arise without religious compunctions and provide the services unconscionable to the religious. Where is the need to morally enslave those who disagree with you?

    1. You know, the irony here Ronnie is that you’re making the argument FOR non-discrimination laws. The point is that it shouldn’t matter what your beliefs are, what your sexual orientation or gender identity is, or your race, gender, height, weight, eye color, etc. The only thing that should matter at your job is your ability to perform your duties. The only thing that should matter on your rental application is whether or not you can pay rent on time.

      You feel like your religion preaches that being gay is a sin? Fine, that’s your beliefs. But show me where in your religion it says that it’s totally cool to evict someone from their home or fire them from their job just because you don’t like who they go home to at night. Your beliefs are your beliefs, and you have your right to them. But you don’t have the right to wield your beliefs as a weapon and harm others just because they don’t believe like you do. That’s how the crusades started, my friend.

Leave a Reply to Eric Ethington Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.